RM2-14.0
4-98
When a commodity price is acceptable prior to the time the commodity will be sold in the cash market, a producer can use a selling hedge to reduce the risk of declining prices.
What Is a Hedge?
A selling hedge involves taking a position in the futures market that is equal and opposite to the position one expects to have in the cash market, so one is covered (subject to basis risk) against price declines during the intervening period. If futures and cash prices decrease while the hedge is in place, the lower cash price the producer realizes for his production is offset by a profit in the futures market. Conversely, if prices increase, losses in the futures market are offset by the improved cash price.
There are five steps to implementing a selling hedge that will likely meet your pricing objectives.
Once the proper futures contract is selected, pay close attention to the contract month. Project the date of the anticipated cash market transaction and select the futures contract month that best corresponds to that date. For example, an expected September corn sale would be hedged against December CBOT corn futures, since there are no contracts available for October or November.
Case Example: Selling Hedge for Corn
Bill is a corn farmer in the Texas Panhandle. He has a 10-year average corn production of 24,000
bushels on his farm, and at no time in the past 5 years has that production dropped below 15,000
bushels. In March, Bill notices the December CBOT corn futures are trading at $2.65/ bushel.
Further, Bill knows the historical harvest time basis for corn in his county is -$ 0.05/ bushel
relative to futures (i.e., cash price is $0.05/ bushel less than futures price). Based on futures information, he projects a harvest time price of $2.60/ bushel
($ 2.65 -$0.05), which is acceptable to him. Because Bill fears a possible price decline between
March and harvest, he elects to implement a selling hedge on 15,000 bushels (three contracts at
5,000 bushels each) because he has a reasonable expectation of producing this quantity based on his
production history (Table 1).
Table 1.
| Cash Market | Futures Market | Basis | |
| March 5 | Objective: to realize corn sales price of $2.60/ bu | Sells three CBOT December corn contracts at $2.65/bu | Projected at -$ 0.05/ bu |
| October 10 | Sells 15,000 bu of corn at $2.40/ bu | Buys three CBOT December corn contracts at $2.45/bu | Actual basis, -$ 0.05/ bu ($ 2.40-$ 2.45) |
| Gain or loss in Futures: | Gain of $0.20 ($ 2.65 -$2.45) | ||
Results:
Actual cash sales price..............................$ 2.40
Futures profit ........................................+$ 0.20
Realized sales price ..................................$ 2.60*
*Without commission and interest.
How Did the Corn Selling Hedge Work?
Bill projected a harvest-time selling price of $2.60/ bushel on March 5. On October 10, he sold his corn for $2.40/ bushel and liquidated his futures position. The decrease in corn prices he had feared did occur, and the cash price he received for his corn was less than his projection. However, Bill realized a $0.20/ bushel profit from the decrease in the CBOT December corn futures price. Applying the $0.20/ bushel futures profit to the cash price, the realized (or net) selling price for the 15,000 bushels he hedged was $2.60/ bushel, just as he had projected.
Without Bill's accurate basis forecast, the projected selling price and realized selling price would have been different. A favorable basis move (i.e., a narrowed basis) would have yielded a higher realized sales price, while an unfavorable basis move would have decreased the net selling price. In a hedged position, the producer trades price risk for basis risk. Once more, the basis forecast is a key to hedging with futures.
Did Bill receive $2.60/ bushel for his entire crop? The answer depends on the quantity produced. If he produced his historical average of 24,000 bushels, he was protected at $2.60/ bushel for the 15,000 bushels he hedged and received a price at harvest of $2.40/ bushel for the unhedged 9,000 bushels. This yields a weighted average price of $2.525/ bushel. Had he produced more than his historical average yield, the weighted average price would have been less than $2.525/ bushel. If he produced less than his historical average yield, the weighted average price would have been higher than $2.525/ bushel. Actual production determines the final average price per bushel.
Case Example: Selling Hedge for Corn (continued)
What If Bill's Price Outlook Was Incorrect?
Let's examine the effects of a price increase on the performance of Bill's corn selling hedge (Table 2).
Table 2.
| Cash Market | Futures Market | Basis | |
| March 5 | Objective: to realize corn sales price of $2.60/ bu | Sells three CBOT December corn contracts at $2.65/bu | Projected at -$ 0.05/ bu |
| October 10 | Sells 15,000 bu of corn at $2.85/ bu | Buys three CBOT December corn contracts at $2.90/bu | Actual basis, -$ 0.05/ bu ($ 2.85-$ 2.90) |
| Gain or loss in Futures: | Loss of $0.25 ($ 2.65 -$2.90) | ||
Results:
Actual cash sales price..............................$ 2.85
Futures loss ............................................-$0.25
Realized sales price ..................................$ 2.60*
*Without commission and interest.
Bill's pricing objective of $2.60/ bu was achieved for the 15,000 bushels hedged. This example illustrates the discipline necessary when hedging. Although Bill might be frustrated with the results of this selling hedge in a rising market, he should remember that the decision to hedge was made after careful analysis and his best price forecast. While Bill might not be happy about a net price of $2.60/ bushel, his plan was sound, he still obtained his desired profit for this part of his corn crop, and he will likely maintain, if not improve, his overall financial position.
Table 3.
| Advantages and Disadvantages of a Selling Hedge with Futures | |
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
| 1. Reduces risk of price declines | 1. Gains from price increases are limited |
| 2. Could make it easier to obtain credit | 2. Risk that actual basis will differ from projection |
|
3. Establishing a price aids in management decisions and can help stabilize crop income within a crop year |
3. Year-to-year income fluctuations may not be reduced with hedging |
| 4. Easier to cancel than a forward contract | 4. Contract quantity is standardized and may not arrangement match cash quantity |
| 5. Futures position requires a margin deposit and margin calls are possible | |
*Extension Program Specialist-Risk Management and Professor and Extension Economist, The Texas A& M
University System; and Extension Agricultural Economists, Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment
Station and Cooperative Extension Service.
|
Partial funding support has been provided by the Texas Wheat Producers Board, Texas Corn Producers Board, Texas Farm Bureau. |
Produced by Agricultural Communications, The Texas A&M University System
Extension publications can be found on the Web at: http://agpublications.tamu.edu
Educational programs of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service are open to all citizens without regard to race, color, sex, disability, religion, age or national origin.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Home Economics, Acts of Congress of May 8, 1914, as amended, and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the United States Department of Agriculture. Chester P. Fehlis, Deputy Director, Texas Agricultural Extension Service, The Texas A&M University System. 1M, New ECO